The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision to create a body
called the AI Authority.
A
bill
to
Make provision for the regulation of artificial intelligence; and for connected purposes.
B e it enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—
The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision to create a body
called the AI Authority.
The functions of the AI Authority are to—
ensure that relevant regulators take account of AI;
ensure alignment of approach across relevant regulators in respect of
AI;
undertake a gap analysis of regulatory responsibilities in respect of
AI;
coordinate a review of relevant legislation, including product safety,
privacy and consumer protection, to assess its suitability to address
the challenges and opportunities presented by AI;
monitor and evaluate the overall regulatory framework’s effectiveness
and the implementation of the principles in
section 2
, including the
extent to which they support innovation;
assess and monitor risks across the economy arising from AI;
conduct horizon-scanning, including by consulting the AI industry,
to inform a coherent response to emerging AI technology trends;
support testbeds and sandbox initiatives (see
section 3
) to help AI
innovators get new technologies to market;
provide education and awareness to give clarity to businesses and to
empower individuals to express views as part of the iteration of the
framework;
promote interoperability with international regulatory frameworks.
The Secretary of State may by regulations amend the functions in
subsection
(2)
, and may dissolve the AI Authority, following consultation with such
persons as he or she considers appropriate.
The AI Authority must have regard to the principles that—
regulation of AI should deliver—
safety, security and robustness;
appropriate transparency and explainability;
fairness;
accountability and governance;
contestability and redress;
any business which develops, deploys or uses AI should—
be transparent about it;
test it thoroughly and transparently;
comply with applicable laws, including in relation to data
protection, privacy and intellectual property;
AI and its applications should—
comply with equalities legislation;
be inclusive by design;
be designed so as neither to discriminate unlawfully among
individuals nor, so far as reasonably practicable, to perpetuate
unlawful discrimination arising in input data;
meet the needs of those from lower socio-economic groups,
older people and disabled people;
generate data that are findable, accessible, interoperable and
reusable;
a burden or restriction which is imposed on a person, or on the
carrying on of an activity, in respect of AI should be proportionate to
the benefits, taking into consideration the nature of the service or
product being delivered, the nature of risk to consumers and others,
whether the cost of implementation is proportionate to that level of
risk and whether the burden or restriction enhances UK international
competitiveness.
The Secretary of State may by regulations amend the principles in subsection
(1), following consultation with such persons as he or she considers
appropriate.
The AI Authority must collaborate with relevant regulators to construct
regulatory sandboxes for AI.
In this section a “regulatory sandbox” is an arrangement by one or more
regulators which—
allows businesses to test innovative propositions in the market with
real consumers;
is open to authorised firms, unauthorised firms that require
authorisation and technology firms partnering with, or providing
services to, UK firms doing regulated activities;
provides firms with support in identifying appropriate consumer
protection safeguards;
requires tests to have a clear objective and to be conducted on a small
scale;
requires firms which want to test products or services which are
regulated activities to be authorised by or registered with the relevant
regulator before starting the test.
The Secretary of State may by regulations amend the description in subsection
(2)
, following consultation with such persons as he or she considers
appropriate.
The Secretary of State, after consulting the AI Authority and such other
persons as he or she considers appropriate, must by regulations provide that
any business which develops, deploys or uses AI must have a designated AI
officer, with duties—
to ensure the safe, ethical, unbiased and non-discriminatory use of AI
by the business;
to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, that data used by the
business in any AI technology is unbiased (see section 2(1)(c)(iii)).
“(iv)any development, deployment or use of AI by the
company, and the name and activities of the AI officer
designated under the Artificial Intelligence (Regulation)
Act 2024,”.
The Secretary of State, after consulting the AI Authority and such other
persons as he or she considers appropriate, must by regulations provide that—
any person involved in training AI must—
supply to the AI Authority a record of all third-party data and
intellectual property (“IP”) used in that training; and
assure the AI Authority that—
they use all such data and IP by informed consent;
and
they comply with all applicable IP and copyright
obligations;
any person supplying a product or service involving AI must
give customers clear and unambiguous health warnings,
labelling and opportunities to give or withhold informed
consent in advance; and
any business which develops, deploys or uses AI must allow
independent third parties accredited by the AI Authority to
audit its processes and systems.
Regulations under this section may provide for informed consent to be express
(opt-in) or implied (opt-out) and may make different provision for different
cases.
The AI Authority must—
implement a programme for meaningful, long-term public engagement
about the opportunities and risks presented by AI; and
consult the general public and such persons as it considers appropriate
as to the most effective frameworks for public engagement, having
regard to international comparators.
In this Act “artificial intelligence” and “AI” mean technology enabling the
programming or training of a device or software to—
perceive environments through the use of data;
interpret data using automated processing designed to approximate
cognitive abilities; and
make recommendations, predictions or decisions;
with a view to achieving a specific objective.
AI includes generative AI, meaning deep or large language models able to
generate text and other content based on the data on which they were trained.
Regulations under this Act are made by statutory instrument.
Regulations under this Act may create offences and require payment of fees,
penalties and fines.
A statutory instrument containing regulations under section
1
or
2
or
regulations covered by
subsection (2)
may not be made unless a draft of the
instrument has been laid before and approved by resolution of both Houses
of Parliament.
A statutory instrument containing only regulations not covered by
subsection
(3)
is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of
Parliament.
A statutory instrument containing regulations applying to Wales, Scotland
or Northern Ireland must be laid before Senedd Cymru, the Scottish Parliament
or the Northern Ireland Assembly respectively before being made.
This Act extends to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed.
This Act may be cited as the Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Act 2024.
A
bill
to
Make provision for the regulation of artificial intelligence; and for connected purposes.
Ordered to be Printed, .
© Parliamentary copyright House of Lords 2023
This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright
Published by the authority of the House of Lords