Lead member
The Earl of Lytton
Crossbench, Excepted Hereditary
Lords
Decision
Not moved
The amendment was not moved. The House was not invited to take a decision on it (though it may have been debated with other amendments).
Amendment text
Clause 3, page 4, line 6
after “hereditament” insert “other than a qualifying retail, hospitality or leisure hereditament”
Member's explanatory statement
This, together with another amendment in the name of the Earl of Lytton, would have the effect of leaving unoccupied large RHL properties paying the standard multiplier rather than the supplement consistent with previously stated policy intentions.