Skip to main content

Baroness Sugg's amendment, Clause 9

Public Order Act 2023

Report stage

Amendment number: 45

Lead member

Baroness Sugg
Conservative, Life peer
Lords

Decision

Agreed
This amendment was agreed to. Where a member has given notice of their intention to oppose a Clause/Schedule standing part of a Bill, 'agreed' indicates that the Clause/Schedule was removed from the Bill.

Amendment text

Clause 9

Leave out Clause 9 and insert the following new Clause—
“Offence of interference with access to or provision of abortion services
(1) It is an offence for a person who is within a safe access zone to do an act with the intent of, or reckless as to whether it has the effect of—
(a) influencing any person’s decision to access, provide or facilitate the provision of abortion services,
(b) obstructing or impeding any person accessing, providing, or facilitating the provision of abortion services, or
(c) causing harassment, alarm or distress to any person in connection with a decision to access, provide, or facilitate the provision of abortion services.
(2) A “safe access zone” means an area which is within a boundary which is 150 metres from any part of an abortion clinic or any access point to any building or site that contains an abortion clinic and is—
(a) on or adjacent to a public highway or public right of way,
(b) in an open space to which the public has access,
(c) within the curtilage of an abortion clinic, or building or site which contains an abortion clinic, or
(d) in any location that is visible from a public highway, public right of way, open space to which the public have access, or the curtilage of an abortion clinic.
(3) No offence is committed under subsection (1) by—
(a) a person inside a dwelling where the person affected is also in that or another dwelling, or
(b) a person inside a building or site used as a place of worship where the person affected is also in that building or site.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
(5) Nothing in this section applies to—
(a) anything done in the course of providing, or facilitating the provision of, abortion services in an abortion clinic,
(b) anything done in the course of providing medical care within a regulated healthcare facility,
(c) any person or persons accompanying, with consent, a person or persons accessing, providing or facilitating the provision of, or attempting to access, provide or facilitate the provision of, abortion services, or
(d) the operation of a camera if its coverage of persons accessing or attempting to access an abortion clinic is incidental.
(6) In this section—
“abortion clinic” means—
(a) a place approved for the purposes of section 1 of the Abortion Act 1967 by the Secretary of State under subsection 1(3) of that Act, or
(b) a hospital identified in a notification to the Chief Medical Officer under subsection 2(1) of the Abortion Act 1967 in the current or previous calendar year, and published identifying it as such, where “current” or “previous” are references to the time at which an alleged offence under subsection 1 of this section takes place;
“abortion services” means any treatment for the termination of pregnancy;
“dwelling” has the same meaning as in section 1 of this Act.”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment replaces Clause 9 with an updated version following concerns raised at earlier legislative stages in the House of Lords; and in light of the Supreme Court judgment of December 2022 regarding a comparable law in Northern Ireland and the need to ensure compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998.

Sponsors

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Labour
Life peer
Lord Hogan-Howe
Crossbench
Life peer
Baroness Barker
Liberal Democrat
Life peer